physics – Nick Grant

Tag: physics

  • Survivorship Bias

    This is a story about chaotic lives…

    Quantum eraser

    I once spent the best part of a year reading theoretical physics books and papers, voraciously devouring the literature. I was obsessed with the subject – as a keen amateur – and still am, to some extent. My enthusiasm was so great, that I corresponded at length with some theoretical physics professors from around the world, who were kind enough to indulge me.

    As with so many who catch the theoretical physics bug, I was fascinated by the idea that a theory so central to all of modern science – quantum mechanics – might have different interpretations, all equally unprovable, but a lot of fun to think about. The two which are most worthwhile talking about are the many-worlds interpretation (often known simply as “MWI”) and the many-minds interpretation. I shan’t summarise them here. I leave it as an exercise for the reader, if you are intrigued, to find the Wikipedia pages.

    The many-worlds interpretation is something we are very familiar with, from books, films and TV. The concept of parallel universes is so ubiquitous, that it doesn’t merit further discussion.

    The many-minds interpretation is, oddly, quite obscure… but there are experimental hints that this interpretation might be closer to the fundamental nature of reality, than the many-worlds interpretation. I won’t delve into either theory, except to explain some of the challenges to conventional wisdom, which are unintuitive to us.

    I will not, of course, bore you with the “duality of light” wave/particle stuff, or Schrödinger’s cat etc. which have been talked about ad nauseam, such that everyone is vaguely aware of it.

    I will not, or course, talk about relativity. Not useful here.

    So. Here’s the thing. We like to think that our observations are independent. If I see something, then it happened for any and all observers. Let’s take the tree falling in the forest. We agree that if nobody observed it, it’s quite possible that it didn’t make a sound. Fine. Good. However, most of us would say that if just one person saw the tree fall in the forest and heard it make a sound, then it absolutely did make a sound in this observable universe, for all observers. In other words, whatever happens for one person – observably – happens for everybody, even if they didn’t observe the event.

    Not true.

    There’s good evidence that each of us experiences his or her own ‘version’ of reality, and our observations can be different, despite us NOT living in parallel universes. It should be noted that I’m not talking about relativity. We know that when a person is travelling faster than us, or closer to a massive object, time flows at a different rate for them, such that our synchronised wrist watches would show a different time, when compared with each other at a later date – that’s just relativity (special and general, respectively) and that’s not what I’m talking about, even though it’s pretty mind blowing. No… what I’m talking about is two different experimental observers observing different stuff – one says that the tree in the forest made a sound when it fell, and the other says it was silent. It would seem – at a quantum level at least – that this kind of observer independence is entirely supported by experimental results. Search for Wigner’s friend if you want to read more on that one.

    Anyway, moving on to the original point of my essay, I’m a little bit fascinated by quantum suicide. Quantum suicide says that if we were to use a binary quantum event – something with a 50/50 chance of happening – in order to commit suicide, then weirdly, we would never be killed. Because we are the observer in the experiment, in all the instances where we are killed, we are no longer around to observe the results, so – implicitly – we only remain conscious, as an observer, in the case where the event which kills us does not occur. All clear?

    Further, I often think that it’s quite remarkable that I’ve survived up until this point in my life, given the vast quantity of near-death experiences I’ve had, and the reckless risk taking. However, my survival is not evidence that the probability of my death was lower than I had estimated: quite the opposite. There are two distinct possibilities: firstly, I’ve been extremely lucky, and anybody else who copied my behaviour is almost certain to die. Secondly, I’m unaware of all the infinite ways that I’ve died, snuffing out my consciousness, and therefore leaving me unable to recount this tale of miraculously cheating death.

    I am – to a small extent – somewhat convinced that there’s truth in the many-minds interpretation of quantum mechanics, given my first-hand experiences. I may, in fact, calculate the odds that I should have survived everything that I have survived, in order to put a precise figure on exactly how improbable it is that I’m alive, thus providing some empirical evidence for the many-minds interpretation of quantum mechanics… although readers should beware of survivorship bias: if you copy my behaviour, you will most certainly die.

     

    Tags:

  • Particle Physics at 6am

    This is a story about waking up early…

    Cavendish lab

    My brain has been buzzing this week. There has been enormous pressure on me to deliver a complex project and solve a complicated issue at work. My mind seems to be able to cope with juggling a lot of competing demands. Often when I’m doing OK and my life is going well, I find I have spare brain capacity to think about physics and philosophical questions, but not this week – I’ve been way too busy.

    I was delighted this morning when a friend got in contact to say he wanted to ask me:

    “about momentum of massless particle and solar sail”

    I was awake well before my alarm because that’s what happens when my brain is buzzing – I need less sleep. Nothing could have been better to wake up to than a difficult physics problem: how does a solar sail work?

    Anyway, I shan’t bore you with the details, but my friend and I both reached for our Feynman diagrams… well, I already knew that a photons can be absorbed by electrons and emitted, which could translate to a “sail-like” behaviour. Further, I was aware of a device called a Crookes radiometer, which could be said to demonstrate all the properties of a solar sail… although it’s always been questionable whether such a device would work in the vacuum of space. Turns out my brain was working pretty well considering I had just woken up and didn’t have to resort to textbooks or Google to be barking up the right tree.

    I wonder if I’m affected my hypomania. Certainly, I’m working very hard at the moment. Certainly, I’m rushing around being very busy. Certainly, I could easily burn myself out if I’m not careful. Whether I’m hypomanic, I’m not so sure – the praise I’ve received from very important colleagues in recent days has confirmed that I’m not delusional, at least, although it’s perfectly reasonable to assume that I might get carried away… as I often have done in the past.

    The question for me is whether I can regulate my mood or not. I need to calm myself down, remember to rest, remember to relax and remember to pace myself: life’s a marathon, not a sprint… although it’s not if you’re planning on dying young.

    I’m certainly not bored at the moment, which is brilliant. I hate being bored more than anything in the world. I hate waking up and dreading having to go to the office and pretend that I’m busy doing stuff, when in fact I’m losing my mind with boredom and hating every single second.

    I now need to transition from “working really hard” mode to “working at a sustainable pace” mode, without causing any issues. I’ve done a good job of impressing my colleagues, but it’s dangerous to make people overly reliant on you, and I always disliked people who turn themselves into key-man dependencies. I’m genuinely a pretty good team player, I like to think – I’m highly productive, but I don’t squirrel away in isolated obscurity; my work is always done in collaboration with my colleagues.

    Long may this interesting period of my life continue, but I do have to calm down and find a sustainable pace to live my life at.

     

    Tags:

  • Thing my brain told me to say

    This is a story about being an observer…

    Life through a lens

    Regrettable social media rant number 4294967295.

    Mushrooms.

    If you don’t like them, then don’t eat them. Agreed?

    We can sell them. We can have them in our supermarkets. We can have them in convenience stores. We can can find them on amazon dot com.

    We can tolerate the buying, selling, cooking and consumption of mushrooms. Agreed?

    We can see that mushrooms grow everywhere – they spring up in surprising places. Mushrooms are deliberately cultivated, because so many people enjoy eating them and choose to have them as part of their diet. We also regularly see mushrooms growing wild, i.e. not due to any deliberate human action or inaction.

    Nobody needs to sow any seeds. Nobody needs to do anything.

    Poppies and hemp are ubiquitous species that most laypeople would recognise as a cash crop farmed in a monoculture: Massive fields full of the same thing, planted and being nurtured by humans. Mushrooms are different because mushrooms grow wild all over the many islands of the United Kingdom.

    We can tolerate the existence of mushrooms. Agreed?

    We have not embarked upon any eradication programs to rid ourselves of a popular edible foodstuff that grows wild in our environment, without any human cultivation. We have not tried to wipe out a source of human nourishment which many people choose to have in their diet because they enjoy the flavour, texture and smell of mushrooms.

    Yet.

    Bizarre as this sounds…

    I picked an edible foodstuff from where I found it growing wild, and I ate it. During the briefest of moments, when the mushroom was picked and was being transferred to my mouth, I was breaching the law.

    During the few elapsed seconds it took me to pick a wild mushroom, put in my mouth and swallow it, I could have been arrested and prosecuted for a very serious crime that carries extremely harsh punishments.

    That’s weird, right?

    Weirder still is that once the mushroom was in my stomach I was no longer arrestable or prosecutable. If I had lowered my mouth over the mushroom, bitten it and swallowed it, arguably no crime was committed at all. If somebody else had picked the mushroom and dropped it into my open mouth, then I didn’t break the law.

    Even weirder is that the punishment I might have received for picking a wild mushroom and moving it to my own mouth to be swallowed, appears to imply that my actions were very gravely deleterious to society and the wider human race. The maximum punishment I could have received as a sentence for my crime would be 7 years in prison and be to fined an unlimited amount of money.

    There are only x trillions of pounds sterling equivalent of all global currencies in circulation worldwide, but the law would allow for me to be fined quadrillions, quintillions or indeed an infinite amount of money. Why not fine me a googol pounds? Why not fine me a Graham’s number of pounds?

    What for? What did I do that was so bad? What was wrong about my behaviour? Please explain it to me.

    Usually with crimes, there are victims. If you perpetrated a crime where there was a victim, harm was caused to property, or there was antisocial behaviour, then you need to be punished. That is obvious.

    For example, if I killed somebody, injured somebody or raped somebody – or otherwise caused harm to a victim and/or their property –  then I would need to be punished. We democratically decided what the punishments for crimes should be. We made our own laws via the democratic system. We have elected to have a justice system, policing and punitive institutions. Our laws are an approximation of what the majority of people would deem unacceptable behaviour in our society. We each individually differ with our opinions on what is right and what is wrong, but collectively, we have agreed upon one set of laws, which apply to almost all of us.

    Let’s just take a second.

    To digest.

    Let’s now try to swallow all of this.

     

    Pause.

     

    Possession of mushrooms is considered to be exactly the same as possession of crack cocaine, crystal meth, heroin and other “class A” controlled substances.

    Cannabis plants haven’t spontaneously started growing all over the United Kingdom. Somebody had to plant the seeds. Somebody has to cultivate the cannabis plants. Deliberately grown cannabis plants, which required so much human effort to bring to these islands where the plant varieties do not naturally occur, incur only the wrath of the law we reseve for “class B” controlled substances.

    Nobody is selling cannabis leaves in my local supermarket. Nobody is making TV cooking shows where cannabis leaves are considered to be an edible foodstuff included in a meal.

    Cannabis leaves don’t really need to exist – have no need to exist – because they’re not a common part of people’s diet.

    Even if you selectively bred and cross-bred cannabis varieties with the aim of creating a more palatable leaf, you would struggle to persuade many people to eat the leaves.

    If we study all recipes for appetising food that have occurred anywhere since the we first started making intelligible marks onto things – beginning with cave paintings and carved objects – we see no evidence of cannabis leaves as an ingredient that you’d want in your salad.

    This is an assumption, based on observable human behaviour over countless millennia, but the overwhelming evidence indicates that we collectively agree that cannabis leaves don’t belong in our mouths as part of our diet.

    I would ask for you agreement, but I think you should be allowed to eat a cannabis leaf to decide for yourself whether you like the taste. However, I can assure you that all the countless recipe books aren’t wrong: cannabis leaves taste bad.

    Once again: cannabis leaves taste terrible, hence why they have not become a popular meal ingredient.

    Cannabis leaves have no place alongside the other leafy vegetables we consider to be human nourishment.

    Agreed?

    Mushrooms aren’t to everyone’s tastes, but they are an ingredient in recipes which predate written language. Mushrooms were known to be food before humans even invented the word “food”. The human animal finds the taste of mushroom flesh to be appetising. The human animal always prefers to eat mushrooms not lemons. Although a diet of lemons might technically sustain you, I suspect you would be hard-pressed to find a single person in 7.6 billion who chooses a diet of lemon-like foodstuffs as a significant source of their daily calorific nourishment requirements.

    So if it’s a choice between mushrooms or starving to death, you’d eat the mushrooms. Agreed?

    If it’s a choice between eating lemons, eating mushrooms, or starving, you’d choose the mushrooms. Agreed?

    If ever there was a more ludicrous example of an approach to what is legally referred to as “The Misuse of Drugs” then it would be criminalising the possession of mushrooms.

    We had better build a whole lot of prisons to hold all the farmers, greengrocers, supermarket employees, cooks, chefs, restauranteurs, diners – practically every person in the entire United Kingdom – for having some mushrooms.

    Mushrooms are quite literally everywhere: Growing everywhere. We can’t control them.

    Having a law that talks about “controlled substances” and “Misuse of Drugs” whilst also classifying mushrooms as “class A” – the very most harmful substances to society – is beyond ridiculous.

    If ever there was a better example of nature refusing to be controlled by human laws, then it would be mushrooms.

    Mushrooms stubbornly refuse to be controlled, even though they are specifically referred to in law as “controlled”. They are literally called a “controlled substance” when our own eyes confirm that mushrooms do not care about human laws and refuse to be controlled by any statutory instrument. Mushrooms act in contempt of our courts. Mushrooms spitefully flout our laws.

    Mushrooms wilfully refuse to comply with the wishes of Her Majesty the Queen, resisting and obstructing the Crown’s agents. Mushrooms have no respect for the individuals who have been elected to represent their constituents as Members of Parliament, sitting in the House of Commons in the Palace of Westminster by virtue of the democratic system of governance, as self-determined by the citizens of the United Kingdom.

    Ha ha ha.

    Joke’s on you suckers.

    You literally voted for mushrooms, in so many ways. With your pounds. With your electoral ballot. With what you put in your shopping trolley. You voted with your mouth, in so many ways, but mainly by putting mushrooms into your mouth.

    You wanted mushrooms. Most people want mushrooms.

    Yet, you also allegedly wanted mushrooms to be so very criminal, that their possession, dealing, cultivation and trafficking would deprive UK citizens of their liberty FOR LIFE, detained at Her Majesty’s pleasure. However, I suspect that is not what what most people want.

    You want mushrooms in your shopping trolley, but the law considers them to be EXACTLY THE SAME as crack cocaine, heroin and crystal meth.

    Are you high?

    Will somebody please come and lock me up, because I bought mushrooms, cooked them and ate them.

    When should I expect the police?

    Or should I just hand myself in at the nearest police station?

    What should I do with any mushrooms I have left remaining uneaten? Should I put them in my compost bin, like the local council tells me to do, or should I hand them over to the police as evidence?

    What would be the learned opinion of any Queen’s Counsel who I retained the services of? What would the opinion of the Attorney-General be? What would the right honourable Geoffrey Cox think about my mushrooms? What about the countless mushrooms which continue to exist in flagrant disregard of the statutory instruments which control them, the judiciary, the courts, the police and the other Crown institutions which seek to enforce the laws of the United Kingdom?

    Is this what “take back control” looks like? Apparently that’s what 51.9% of the UK population democratically voted to do.

    Assuming that we regain full control, do you think mushrooms will begin to care about the laws controlling them?

    Fundamentally, isn’t there just one set of laws we can all universally agree upon?

    You can’t legislate in contradiction to the universal laws of physics.

    You can’t just write something down on a “special” piece of paper and expect the universe to comply.

    Again, for those who are slow learners: The only laws are the universal laws of physics, which are immutable.

    The laws of physics are universal and have existed – and will always exist – while there is a universe.

    You can dress up in fancy wigs and robes and prance around in grand buildings. You can put shiny things that you found in the ground onto your head if you like. But you know what? The universe thinks you’re an idiot if you do that. The universe thinks you’re absurdly insignificant and finds it perversely hilarious that its laws quite literally predicted your existence and your behaviour, but yet you do do not properly perceive what is so obviously observable all around you.

    If you think humans make and enforce laws, you are an imbecile, as illustrated by the humble mushroom.

    Humans and their behaviour were preordained from the moment of the universe’s conception, along with the immutable and universal laws of physics. The laws of physics predicted and explained literally everything.

    If you think that mushrooms can be controlled by statutory instruments created by Acts of Parliament, with Crown agents of Her Majesty The Queen enforcing those statutory instruments, then you my friend, have overlooked almost the entire observable universe.

    Through simple observation, we can plainly see the irrefutable evidence of the existence of a set of fundamental and universal laws, which are immutable.

    In short: Mushrooms exist. Deal with it.

    Deal with it by understanding and accepting what is observable.

    Do not “deal with it” with acts of human behaviour that the universe doesn’t care about. The universal immutable fundamental laws of physics predicted all your BS well before you even thought about it.

    Deal with it.

    Deal with it all.

    Accept it.

    You cannot change the laws of physics, no matter how badly you want to. Irrespective of your genius or how you manage to collectively conspire, no individual, group or entire species can ever change or avoid the fundamental universal immutable laws of physics which govern all things for all time.

    I know it’s a lot to take in, but I suggest you make a start by opening your eyes.

    Then, just observe.

    Mushrooms exist and we should stop having a tantrum about their existence, because that behaviour is ludicrous, absurd and also totally hilariously predictable. Yet, the majority of us are unforgivably ignorant and act petulantly and arrogantly, whenever we assume that WE make and enforce the laws, when in fact the [universal] LAWS [of physics] MADE EVERYTHING, including us and mushrooms: We’re made of the same stuff.

     

    Tags:

  • Insignificant Speck

    This is a story about sonder…

    Supermoon

    Is it useful to have a realistic appreciation of your own insignificance? Is it useful to correctly perceive that you’re not significantly different from any of the 7.6 billion other people on the planet, or the 108 billion humans who lived and died since homo sapiens first appeared as a new species? Is it useful to be conscious of your cosmological insignificance, where the entire human race will be obliterated so completely that it will be as if we never existed? Is it useful to understand the fundmental laws of physics well enough to know that there isn’t going to be a technological breakthrough which might allow us to travel to another star when our sun dies? Is it good to know that in the long run, nothing matters, because we live in a godless universe with no afterlife, and we are destined to be forgotten?

    Just as we might become aware that every other person has a rich and complex life of their own, we can equally become aware of humanity’s wider insignificance.

    Warp drives, wormholes, time travel, cryogenics and hypersleep are all lovely sci-fi fantasies, but we can’t even solve the basics, such as the fair distribution of wealth so that we can all have clean drinking water and enough to eat. There isn’t going to be a colony on Mars. We’re as likely to kill ourselves in nuclear armageddon as we are to die because of runaway man-made climate change. Yes, we’ve made great strides in science and technology in recent years. All those advancements are being used for killing each other in increasingly nasty ways.

    The population growth trends are easy to extrapolate, along with predictions about our ability to use the available land to produce food, leading to the unavoidably obvious conclusion that we’re going to have mass-starvation of billions of people, in barely a couple of decades. If you like to trot out the tired old lines about what a monster Stalin was, you ain’t seen nothing until you’ve seen what capitalism can do to billions. It’s already easy to see what industrial capitalist society has done to the environment, causing all manner of extreme weather events and natural disasters, which are anything but natural, because things are exacerbated by man-made climate change.

    It’s easy for me to write about the need to show some restraint and forego some luxuries, because I’ve been lucky enough to have enjoyed those luxuries for quite a long time. What about all those people who haven’t yet had a taste of Western imperialist decadence? Isn’t it unfair that those who’ve only ever known poverty and deprivation will never get to live a decadent lifestyle?

    Many in the guardian class would prefer it if you just damn well knew your place, and stopped trying to improve your standard of living. How else are the guardian class going to snobbily believe they’re a cut above the rest of the society, if every man and his dog is able to have a nice lifestyle? Get back in your place, you proletariat scum.

    Thus, we arrive at the new class warfare. We ALL think that we should be at the front of the queue, and we ALL know how to get there, thanks to the internet.

    The internet is a humbling place. Where else can you face such an enormous deluge of individual people who all think they’re special, unique and different? Everybody’s going what they think is an important opinion to share; that they have a voice that needs to be heard. Everybody thinks they’re good looking, talented, intelligent. Everybody thinks they’re capable of original thoughts and ideas; that they’re creative.

    It’s hard to maintain your own sanity when you see all those social media accounts controlled by all those individuals, who’ve carefully chosen their name, bio, profile picture, and then carefully creates and curates their own content, according to their personality and the image they wish to project. It’s hard to be a homo sapiens with the same hardware that evolved 350,000 years ago, when the population was 99.999% smaller and we didn’t have any technology except fire and pointy sticks. Our brains really aren’t built to cope with constant reminders that we’re an insignificant speck.

    We might hope to build up our social media following – our celebrity status – and begin to broadcast ourselves to big audiences, hoping to make ourselves feel somewhat less insignificant, but it’s delusional. A judge and jury might convict a person of a serious crime, locking them up for life, but all 14 of those people will die at more-or-less the same time, be cremated or buried. In 4 or 5 generations, those 14 people will be completely forgotten – the criminal will be indistinguishable from those who sat in judgement. For a psychiatrist to diagnose a patient as having delusions of grandeur, is also a delusion of grandeur – both are suffering from the delusion that they have any importance at all, when clearly they are both equally insignificant.

    Significance is an invention of the human mind, as a coping mechanism for the increasingly inescapable realisation that nobody matters, nothing matters, we’re all dead in the long-run and every piece of evidence that we ever existed is destined to be obliterated some completely, that even alien archeologists with futuristic gadgetry, would never know anything about our entire race; our whole history.

    It’s pure vanity to think that you’re important; that you’ll be remembered.

     

    Tags:

  • Eccentric Orbit

    This is a story about resonant frequencies…

    Wet wheels

    Little things can send me into an unexpected tailspin. Little things matter. Molehills get magnified into mountains and there are storms in teacups. My life appears to be quite normal, ordered, sensible and stable, but it’s an illusion: everything is really quite fragile under the thin veneer.

    Last week I spent several hours trying to get the sound working on my battered Macbook Pro, which had been recently repaired after some water/moisture damage. There had been a small puff of smoke and the smell of electrical burning at the weekend, which had been rather worrisome, but the laptop seemed to soldier on unaffected… I hadn’t noticed that it had become mute.

    Software is my job, so I threw all of my 21+ years of experience at solving the problem, plus all the other years of my youth which were mis-spent tinkering with computers… I should have been able to fix the problem. Alas, I decided that it must definitely be a hardware problem and therefore it was going to be expensive to fix and well beyond my very amateurish soldering abilities: I’m a software expert, not a hardware expert.

    It’s rare that a technical problem like that defeats me. Having already spent the best part of £600 having my Macbook repaired, I was pretty disappointed that something had gone bang inside it, leaving me with a partially-broken Macbook.

    I knew that I could buy an adapter for my headphones for less than £10 which would be a cheap workaround for the problem, but every single thing that’s a bit tatty and old and partially-broken in my life adds up to a bigger feeling of being overwhelmed by life; that everything’s falling apart.

    It seems like everything that’s damaged tells the same story: stuff got messed up when I myself was in a messed up sick state.

    I’ve replaced a lot of things like-for-like and that really helps. Rather than having constant daily reminders that I broke, damaged or lost things of importance, I’ve spent the money to get things back to how they should be. Fixing those little things has cost me a lot of money, but the benefit is greater than you might imagine. You probably think you could put up with all the annoying little things, and the things which seem to be superficial, but I can’t; it upsets me.

    I forgot to wash, dry and pack a couple of T-shirts for my working week. At lunch I managed to drop some food onto my nice clean shirt that I was wearing, so I won’t be able to wear that again this week. The nice hotel I was staying in near the office had a laundry service, but the one I was forced to book as an alternative doesn’t have those facilities. Tomorrow I have to choose between wearing an unironed shirt, an unironed T-shirt or a smelly T-shirt. I already had to spend all afternoon sat at my desk with a stain on my shirt, because I knew there was no point in going to the car to swap my stained shirt for any of those unappealing options.

    These little things – the laptop sound, the hotel, the shirt – they sound like nothing, but they have a far bigger impact my my sense of wellbeing than you would expect.

    One might imagine that it’s only catastrophic events which truly affect us, and everything else can be tolerated, but all the little things add up: it’s death by a thousand cuts.

    The things that bother me are quite mundane and boring, and some sound quite easy to fix if you don’t actually have to do the fixing… for example a couple of bits of damage to the paint and plasterwork in my apartment. Any idiot knows that a bit of filler and a bit of paint will take care of the problem, but of course to repair anything properly is a lot easier said than done. Perhaps nobody notices the little blemishes and the bodge-jobs, but I do and it’s me who has to see them morning, noon and night, every day of my miserable life.

    It seems so petty to be whining about tiny blemishes, but the only way I can think to describe it with the analogy of a heavy flywheel which is rotating extremely fast. A tiny chip out of the flywheel’s metal will cause vibration. The weight of the flywheel creates tremendously high energy from the centripetal force of its rotation, and the vibration puts a lot of stress on the axle. Before long, the whole machine which the flywheel is attached to will shake itself to pieces.

    All of the disruption to my routine, my stability, my living, working, travelling, eating and other such arrangements… it’s all highly stressful. Chuck in a few seemingly insignificant other things, and I worry that I’m going to fly off the handle unpredictably, or something apparently minor will trigger a major breakdown.

    Why make things any harder than they need to be?

     

    Tags:

  • How to Become Irreverent

    This is a story about the values you raise your children with…

    Church window

    It seems like I have had the sentimental attachment most of us feel towards everything we revere in society systematically thrashed out of me. If you pick one thing that summons feelings of safety, security, comfort, respect for authority and faith in the divine/spiritual, then I will tell you how exactly how I came to question everything: every institution, everything sacred, every tradition, every profession, people who are normally considered beyond reproach and ultimately even existence and its purpose.

    Starting with my birth, I’m literally a bastard. I was born outside of wedlock. My parents never married and always planned to remain unmarried, such that I took my mother’s surname instead of my father’s. Ironically, my mother had once been married, and I have the surname of her ex-husband instead of her maiden name. Confused? Imagine trying to explain that to your fellow pre-schoolers when you’re 3 years old. I didn’t really understand it at the time, but I understood that I was different; unusual.

    My schools would often address letters intended for my parents to Mr & Mrs Grant, and my father would always tell me that I was the only Mr Grant in the house and therefore the letter was addressed to me. My mother would tell me that she was no longer Mrs Grant and she was Ms Grant. “Why not Miss?” I would ask, and she would explain that she had been married, and Miss was only used by women who hadn’t been married. If anybody telephoned the house and asked to speak to Mr Grant, my father would hand the receiver to me and say “it’s for you”, which it never was, of course.

    I understood that there was divorce and some of my school-friends were raised by a single parent, or a step-parent. My peers would often ask if my father was my step-father, to which I would reply “no”. Nobody could understand how I came to have a different surname from my biological father, or entertain the notion that I could have been given my mother’s surname, not my father’s.

    At some point, a fairly clear question formed in my mind: “why aren’t my parents married?”. 

    The reasons why people get married had become quite clear in my mind, for the very simple reason that I had endured years and years of people’s reactions that suggested that not getting married was very atypical behaviour. Nobody wants to feel unusual; freakish. Nobody likes to feel odd.

    When I posed my question – “why aren’t you married?” – to my parents, they replied with their own question: “why should we get married?”. I had a pretty easy answer for them, as I’ve explained: because that’s what everybody else does. “Do you want to be like everybody else?” my parents asked. “Yes” I replied.

    [I just burst into uncontrollable sobbing. If it wasn’t what you experienced, I don’t think you can begin to understand what it’s like to spend your entire childhood as the freakish weirdo; the odd one out… the one who’s different from everybody else]

    Having covered marriage there is a natural segue into the topic of religion, and the origins of my atheism.

    For a number of formative and important childhood years I lived in an attractive terraced house in an area called Jericho, on one of the most desirable roads in central Oxford. These houses are the most expensive in the world, far exceeding real estate prices in London, San Francisco and Hong Kong, in terms of their affordability. However, these £1.5 million houses were bought by the first wave of gentrifiers, when academics and young professionals with families started to move into slummy areas because they couldn’t afford family homes in the more desirable parts of the city.

    When your immediate neighbours include an MP, a barrister, a heart surgeon, a City banker and a number of promenant Oxford dons and professors, their children were raised in an environment which was knowledge-rich and encouraged the exploration afforded by a curious rational mind; critical thinking. Nobody went to church. My friends, whose father was a consultant at Oxford John Radcliffe Hospital, went to Quaker “friends meetings” occasionally, but my peer group – the sons and daughters of the intellectual elite – had little place for God and church in their lives.

    We should rewind a little bit, back to the village our family lived in before we moved to central Oxford. If one were to imagine the most quintessentially English picturesque Cotswolds village, with the manor house, the village green, the workers’ cottages, the post office and village shop, the village pub, the village school, one should not forget the church and its graveyard. The church’s presence and influence is not to be underestimated. My religious indoctrination began as soon as I started school, with the vicar regularly present. Village social events are very often church-linked, like harvest festival, and of course everybody who grew up in such an idyllic village wants to get married in that particular church, have their children baptised there and be buried in that graveyard.

    Essentially, the church’s opportunity to exploit a child’s vulnerable immature mind were scuppered by my father. For everything that the church had a comforting but incorrect explanation for, my dad cited a lack of evidence and instilled in me the skepticism which gradually became integral to my developing personality: “show me the evidence”.

    When we moved to the centre of a city whose university is globally recognised for its academic excellence, I never encountered another simple-minded fool who had been persuaded to believe in Gods and other aspects of religion, which are so obviously irreconcilable with the pursuit of knowledge. Religion encourages ignorance but I had been raised to question everything and remain skeptical until I had seen convincing proof. “What are atoms made of?” I remember asking one of my friends who lived on my street. “Quarks” he replied. We were perhaps only 5 or 6 years old – the product of a childhood immersed in academic culture, as opposed to the sentimental and traditional.

    The disturbing and unpleasant consequences of an irreverent life can impose themselves on a child at a worryingly young age. I’ve already been uncontrollably sobbing about just one thing – the tradition and sanctity of the institution of marriage – and I haven’t even mentioned how a child deals with the concept of mortality and threat of death without the comfort of religion.

    A US Air Force pilot who drank at the village pub which my parents later bought and now live in, drunkenly boasted about the ability of the United States to wipe humanity off the face of the earth. I was definitely no older than 4 years old. With my friend with whom I had discussed subatomic particles, we talked about the temperatures which could be reached near ground zero of a fission or fusion nuclear bomb, and how the radiated ‘heat’ (electromagnetic radiation) had instantly vaporised human beings in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, with only their shadows left behind, permanently etched into the walls of buildings.

    If you believe you live in a Godless world with no afterlife you naturally want to know what everything’s made of if God didn’t make it; you want to know why it’s here. How did it get here? Why is it here? You start to pick everything to pieces by iteratively asking what each thing is made of: humans are made of cells, and cells are made of molecules, and molecules are made of atoms, and atoms are made of quarks and leptons… and you can in fact keep asking the question. There’s good proof that the electron is not a fundamental particle, as had originally been thought.

    When your schoolmates are smart-arse little shits, because their parents are brilliant academics, teachers and school loses its awe and authority. If you’re being taught science that’s almost 100 years old, and sometimes even 200+ years old, the whole exercise is nothing more than a box-ticking exercise to be endured.

    The other thing to consider is that my parents used illegal drugs on a daily basis, and had strong views about the legitimacy and usefulness of the law, certainly in the instances that suited their own addictions. As with many drug users, they were very paranoid. They viewed the police as corrupt and not to be trusted – the enemy. My father’s criminal conviction for drugs not only poisoned his views on the police, but also made him very anti-American, as he believed he would never be allowed to enter the country due to his criminal record.

    [I’m crying again]

    It was only because of first-hand dealings with the police that my viewpoint changed from skepticism due to lack of evidence: the police had never caused me any harm, and in fact I had never had any dealings with the police at all for most of my adult life. You might be surprised to learn I adore and respect the police. My accumulated experience of police encounters has consistently shown that they are some of the most kind, patient, empathetic, forgiving, reasonable people, who have always gone out of their way to bend the rules and simply help as opposed to ever enforcing the letter of the law.

    One shouldn’t mistake my respect for the men and women of the police force for reverence. I would never for a minute expect that a 999 call is somehow going to be the answer to my prayers. I don’t feel safer or more secure, knowing that I can call for police assistance. I wouldn’t feel any more comfortable in a stressful situation if there was a police officer present. Of the very many police men and women who I have had first-hand dealings with, they have always treated me very fairly and kindly, and it’s quite clear that they deal on a daily basis with a huge number of very vulnerable and damaged people, which they do so with incredible compassion – they are the living embodiment of humanity not deities who should be worshipped and revered.

    [More crying]

    So if I don’t revere priests, vicars, teachers, headmistresses, marriage, religion, military superpowers, soldiers, the police, the law and my own parents, what else is there left for me to lack reverence for?

    Cumulatively, I’ve spent almost 6 months having my life saved in hospital – often in high dependency and intensive treatment unit (ITU) wards. Shouldn’t I revere doctors; surgeons?

    I think that if there was one thing that would make almost anybody feel more secure and happy in a stressful situation, it would be knowing that there’s a doctor present. It’s such a clichéd question: “is there a doctor here?”.

    To explain my irreverence for doctors, we merely need to explore the reasons why I have ever had to deal with one, and the outcomes of those interactions.

    Having been lucky enough to escape congenital abnormality, it doesn’t take a rocket surgeon to figure out what I want from a doctor and why. You don’t need to spend 5 or 6 years at medical school to know that the human body has been dealing with pathogens since the species first came into existence. You hardly have to be brain of Britain to figure out whether you’re dealing with a viral, bacterial, fungal or parasitic infection, and furthermore, which is likely to be treatable. In actual fact, I’ve never been to my doctor for antibiotics: every infection has always cleared up on its own. Fungal and parasitic infections can be dealt with without a doctor obviously: head lice shampoo is available in every pharmacy, without a prescription, for example.

    At the age of 28 I went to my doctor wanting treatment for depression, but I knew which specific medications I was prepared to try and which medications I didn’t want because the side effects were not acceptable. Having my choices limited only to SSRIs provided firm evidence that doctors were an obstacle to be overcome, not a panacea.

    When we think about the first time I was hospitalised, do you think I didn’t know that I was going to end up there and what the problems were going to be? Do you think it was an accident that I ended up in hospital?

    Again, you don’t need to spend 5 or 6 years at medical school to know that the human body needs water, salt, glucose, proteins, amino acids, vitamins, minerals and myriad trace elements, or else the bodily functions haven’t got the fuel, carrier fluid and raw materiels they need. You don’t need to be a doctor to know that human body temperature needs to be homeostatic as much as possible – much like every other measurable thing in the human body – and any extreme variation too high or too low is going to have dire consequences.

    When you are making choices in full knowledge of the likely consequences, medicine ceases to be lifesaving magic, and instead it becomes another simple case of what do you want and why?

    One must consider the very last time I was hospitalised to truly understand my irreverence.

    Not only had I quite carefully pre-planned my suicide attempt, when I arrived at hospital against my will, I gave very clear instructions: do not put activated charcoal into my stomach, do not perform gastric lavage, do not intubate, do not provide life support and most importantly of all, do not resuscitate. “Do you know what’s going to happen?” the A&E doctor asked. “Yes. I’m going to die of a combination of organ failure and serotonin syndrome, with a lot of seizures” I replied. “Do you think you’ll be unconscious? Do you think it’ll be painless?” the doctor asked. “No. I expect that it will take a long time to die and I’ll be conscious and in a lot of pain for most of it” I replied. Then I started having seizures.

    Doctors see a lot of people who are scared and they don’t understand what’s happening to them. They’re desperate for somebody who seems to know what they’re doing and what they’re talking about; doctors are an authority figure. I have no doubt that for feckless simpletons and those who lack access to medicine, the arrival of a doctor or a priest/shamen/witch-doctor is incredibly soothing and comforting. If you don’t know what you want and why, your reverence is misplaced, but it may still ease your passage from life to death.

    When shit goes bad, who are you going to turn to? If you have to pick your team of people to survive on a remote island, who are you going to pick and why?

    Why revere anyone? Why kiss anyone’s arse and tell them they’re great because they did the study and training that you could’ve done if you wanted to. You could have passed those exams. You could have gained those qualifications. You could have followed that path if you wanted to. If you wanted it bad enough, you could put on that uniform; you could get that job title; you could prefix or suffix your name with the bit that tells the world just exactly why everyone should drop to their knees and worship you.

    Nothing’s sacred to me. I could do your job if I wanted to.

    I’m not smarter than anybody. I’m not better than anybody. That’s the whole point: I’m lucky enough to not have anything that’s holding me back; limiting my potential.

    I really don’t recommend telling your kids they can follow their dreams and be anything they want to be. I really don’t recommend telling your kids to question everything, and understand everything about how the universe works, to the point where they reach the very bleeding edge of scientific research. I really don’t recommend raising your kids to challenge the status quo and resist the urge to fit in with wider society and their peers.

    Take it from me: there’s a mind-destroying kind of cold uncaring “nothing matters” bad feeling that comes from being too rational; too much of a free-thinker. Take my word for it: understanding the absurdity of existence will destroy your mental health.

    You should probably experiment with hard drugs. That’s probably way less likely to fuck up your life than going down the rabbit-hole of picking everything to pieces and trying to reason from first principles and pure logic.

     

    Tags:

  • Without hope, why go on?

    This is a story about motivation…

    King of Bohemia

    In a godless universe with no afterlife, if you’re not fulfilling the will of your genes and reproducing, what’s the point in being alive? We all die and we’re all forgotten; everything is meaningless. Entropy will destroy everything that’s structured, ordered and regular – we are being systematically destroyed; in the blink of an eye it will be as if we never even existed… all of human history, all civilisations, all buildings, all scientific knowledge, all great men and women, all works of art… it will all be gone.

    Replication; reproduction is the force that fights against entropy. While entropy seeks to return everything to a jumbled and unordered chaotic mess, molecules that are mathematically probable to exist turn into more complex hydrocarbons, acids, proteins and all the other building blocks in the primordial soup, from which emerged the first self-replicating entities. Replication is as inevitable as the force that destroys everything that is ordered and regular, and returns it to disorder and chaos. Replication is the yin to entropy’s yang.

    The fact that you are conscious today, and not at some earlier point in history, is proof that you’re the only consciousness in the cosmos. When you die, the universe dies with you too. You are the sole observer of events from your frame of reference, which means that your universe is unique to you. There are lots of other universes that are similar, but you cannot be conscious of those where you are dead, because your consciousness has ceased to exist, or never existed in them – you can only be conscious when you are alive. It’s inevitable that there would be many other self-replicating entities in your universe with you, in close proximity, because of the spectacularly improbability of all the circumstances being right to create a consciousness – of course there’d be billions of very similar entities, with all very similar experiences, and all similarly ‘conscious’… but your consciousness is unique in your universe, and your universe will end when you do.

    If you’re fulfilling the will of your genes, you are not conscious, you are merely one of the hundreds of billions of human animals that lived and died before you – unthinking fucking baby-making machines, making yet more beasts which will fuck and make more babies… and so on. You’re just a disposable bundle of chemicals that has been used to replicate your genes. You’re spent. You’re trash. You’re a husk; a shell.

    In a godless universe with no afterlife, there’s no point in anything, so you might as well do whatever you want. It could be a good excuse to live a hedonistic pleasure and sensation-seeking life that will maximise the amount of euphoria that you feel. However, you might sadly discover that you’re immortal and find that your morals are completely corrupted. If you believe that the reason for living is to maximise your pleasure, what’s to stop you raping and killing, just for fun? What’s to stop you from raping the earth for your own pleasure? What’s to stop you using and abusing the whole human race, and leaving the surface of the earth scorched and barren, plundered for every single drop of pleasure that you could possibly extract?

    Thus, we arrive at a vision of hell: a planet made uninhabitable by an all-powerful immortal overlord who believes in nothing except their own pleasure, and damn the long-term consequences. It’s pretty easy to see the evidence for that all around us.

    Is there a middle ground?

    I like to think that one day I’ll be able to quit the rat race and become an artist. You might say that I’m already an artist, because I’m a writer, but the bulk of my time and effort is diverted into very mundane bullshit. My day job exhausts me. The need to pay rent and bills and service debts is a huge stress and a strain; a distraction. I’m completely unable to immerse myself in art, because of the arduous job of simply keeping a roof over my head and putting food on the table.

    I’ve worked very hard during my 21+ year full-time career, and although I’ve been able to pursue a period of hedonism up to the point where it nearly killed me, I’ve not been able to ever pursue something I really love and am passionate about. It seems like the opportunity to indulge my passion for art might never be realised – it’s somewhat unattainable.

    I work, always with the slim hope that through hard work I’ll be able to dig myself out of the hole and be able to then follow my dreams, but the realisation of that hope is eternally just out of reach. Hard work just isn’t paying off. It doesn’t matter how hard I work, and how long I work for… I can never reach my goal.

    Why bother? Why bother with the early mornings and the dreadful boredom? Why put up with the stress and the anxiety and the slog of it all? Why put in the effort? Where’s it getting me? Where’s the payoff?

    If life is about the hedonistic pursuit of pleasure, I can do that today and not have to work a single day more. I can end the struggle and return to my hedonistic life. Why bother struggling any more?

    However, if life is about following your dream, and ideally pursuing some aesthetic abstract thing, like art, then I don’t think I’ll ever get there. I think being an artist would be perfect, because it’s a change from the relentless pursuit of things that simply consume and exhaust resources, like procreation and hedonism, growth and conquest, business and capitalism, war, slavery and all the other things that inflict untold human misery.

    I feel like I should be more comfortable than I am; more able to be an artist; more free.

    Why go on? Why struggle anymore?

    I’m not sure if I want to kill myself, or if I just need 2 weeks lying on a beach in a hot country.

     

    Tags:

  • Don’t Scare the Horses

    This is a story about comfort…

    New Forest Ponies

    Halley’s Comet will next be visible in our skies on the 28th of July 2061. If I live that long, I’ll be 82 years old, which is not inconceivable given that the current life expectancy of a man in the United Kingdom is 81.6 years old. As a lifelong non-smoker, I’ve also enjoyed a highly nutritious diet and not done a lot of manual labour or worked with particularly toxic chemicals – in theory, I can reasonably expect to live longer than the current national average, which increases quite steadily. In fact, on average, most men my age can expect to live into their 90s.

    Edmund Halley was able to calculate how regularly the comet that now bears his name, would be visible in our skies, in 1705 – just 18 years after Isaac Newton published Principia Mathematica which famously contained the inverse-square law of gravity.

    Today, we are lucky enough to have telescopes capable of tracking celestial objects with incredible accuracy. We are also blessed with Albert Einstein’s General Relativity which allows us to calculate the movement of the heavenly bodies, in agreement with our observations. Before Einstein’s GR superseded Newton’s law, the orbit of Mercury had not matched up with the predictions of the prevailing theory.

    The question that we are left with is this: were the scientific community to discover a huge space rock hurtling towards Earth on collision course, would it be ethical for them to tell the general public?

    I’ll rephrase and repeat that question again for emphasis: if it were to be discovered that we’re all going to die when a massive asteroid smashes into the planet at 38,000 miles per hour, then should we know about it?

    Ignorance is bliss.

    There will be a certain proportion of society – those who believe all the plants, animals and the Earth were created by a sky monster in just 6 days – who would be resistant to anything that challenges their dogma, no matter how incontrovertible the evidence. There are people who are ridiculously wilfully ignorant, despite the facts, scientific consensus and oversimplifications that spell things out in words of four letters or fewer, complete with cartoon picture-books.

    However, one would have to assume that a large proportion of society would accept that they’re going to die in an incinerating fireball, earthquake, tsunami, shockwave or some other catastrophic consequence of a huge rock vaporising at millions of degrees, as it collides with the globe.

    We could know the specific day that almost everybody is going to be wiped out. Any survivors are likely to die soon after the asteroid impact, due to a cloud of dust and ash that will block out all the heat from the sun. If we were to burn all the coal, oil, gas, trees and use every other energy reserve we have on the planet, we’d only be able to keep ourselves alive for a matter of hours.

    Leaving the planet to go and live on the Moon or Mars is a ridiculous idea – only a handful of people would be able to go, and they’d soon die without shuttles from Earth to restock them with everything that moons and planets lack to support life.

    The choices are: stay and die, or leave and die.

    Given that most of us are going to die in a horrible catastrophe here on Earth, do you think we’re just going to sit back and calmly let the billionaires leave and watch our death from space, like some kind of firework show?

    Knowing that we’re going to die on or around a certain date, along with our family, friends and virtually everybody else on the planet, do you think we’re going to act like normal until it happens?

    Obviously, there would be anarchy, chaos, looting, barbarism.

    If the general public were to learn of the impending doom, wouldn’t they plunge civilisation into such chaos that any efforts to save the planet would be derailed – it would become a self-fulfilling prophecy, because the scientists and engineers who might be able to save the entire Earth and its residents, would be ripped limb-from-limb by a crazed mob.

    The public might not mean to shoot themselves in the foot, but they surely would. Some people who’ve seen too many Hollywood movies would endlessly insist that we fire off our entire nuclear arsenal to vaporise the asteroid in space, which would in fact cause masses of fragments of highly radioactive rock to be rained down on half the globe, in a far more destructive bombardment than anything we’d suffer in a single impact.

    Deflecting an asteroid could never be done on its impact orbit – the object would be too heavy and travelling too fast – so we simply wouldn’t have enough time once we’d discovered the huge rock on collision course to kill us all.

    We would be rabidly demanding the impossible, or simply wanting to live a few hours, days or possibly months longer, at the expense of 7.6 billion other souls – diverting our precious resources into lifeboats that would carry us into the hostile vacuum of space: out of the frying pan and into the fire.

    Those who grasped the hopelessness of the situation would resign themselves to their fate. Knowing that it would be unethical to bring children into a doomed world, would we kill ourselves, live with the melancholy or become hedonists in our remaining time on Earth? Why bother going to work? Why bother paying your rent or your mortgage or otherwise attempting to lead any kind of life like your ancestors, when an extinction event is inevitable?

    If the general public learned of their imminent demise, the collapse of civilised society would be inevitable. So, is it ethical to tell people? In some ways, I’m glad that the world is full of climate change deniers and people who believe that the Earth is flat. It seems plausible that we may have already reached the point of no return, and there are individuals who know beyond all reasonable doubt that we’re all going to die, but they are comforted to know that the general public are sufficiently stupid to not realise until mere moments before their death.

    Don’t scare the horses.

     

    Tags:

  • Concentration

    This is a story about depression and burnout…

    Lime cordial

    If there’s one thing I hate, it’s a long drawn out journey to the grave. I really don’t want to be on my deathbed, remembering the past, but unable to distinguish one day from any other. So many of us are in a routine of waking up, pressing the “snooze” button, having a shower, getting dressed, going to boring bullshit jobs, coming home, watching TV, preparing some food, loading the dishwasher, doing washing & ironing, and having joyless sex or masturbating to pornography – all purely to relieve the animal urges to copulate, eat, drink, piss, shit and sleep.

    Life offers very few opportunities for memorable experiences, especially if you have made the ethical decision not to clone your genes through the impregnation of yourself or somebody else. This does not automatically mean that I consider myself morally superior or in a position to hand down judgements from my high horse. To write emotively on one topic does not logically confer that I hold negative views on those who have embarked up the one-way street that is motherhood or fatherhood. Please; do not send me your protestations that being a parent is both tough and rewarding. I KNOW that parenthood is something that I have no first-hand experience of. I DO respect everyone’s unique set of life decisions – everyone’s gotta live their own life as best as they see fit, and are able to do, playing the cards that have been randomly dealt to them.

    My approach to life remains very much the same as it’s always been: high risk, high reward.

    I joked with a girl – mocking her – that I had fathered a string of illegitimate bastard children, and was being mercilessly pursued by the Child Support Agency (CSA) for money to pay for the upkeep of these offspring that I had carelessly brought into the world. She thought I was being serious.

    So, where is all my wealth hidden? I’ve been a top-bracket taxpayer for most of my working life. Surely I can’t have squandered so much disposable income on drink & drugs, and also been able to have a successful career. This is either unthinkable, or grossly unfair that I’ve had such a surplus, but yet still managed to snatch defeat out of the jaws of victory.

    I’ve paid for convenience whenever I’ve been able to. Why would I clean my toilet, when I could pay somebody less than I earn per hour? While the cleaner has the close encounter with the porcelain throne, I could be working on a more glamourous project that pays very handsomely. It’s a false economy to clean your own toilet, just as it is to do all of the many household chores, which can be done by a professional housekeeper.

    When you apply this cost:benefit analysis to your entire life, you end up spending 37.5 hours a week reading news websites and planning your next holiday; enjoying a lifestyle that is approaching the much vaunted “age of leisure”.

    If you think I’m lazy, you’re wrong. Only a crazy person would do the same repetitive tasks that they could easily automate, or train somebody who’s prepared to do the work – subcontracted or outsourced – for less money, which leaves you with a net profit AND you don’t have to do the shitty job. Repeat this process, because it is scalable, and you’re on the right path… assuming you want to be rich and have lots of spare time. Perhaps you LIKE punching meaningless numbers into spreadsheets. Perhaps you WANT to clean toilets.

    I looked at a list of the seven deadly sins, and realised that I could be a poster boy for Christian immorality.

    If you’ve ever taken an interest in astrology and the signs of the zodiac, then you’re easily fooled by writing that is deliberately ambiguous, leaving the interpretation to the reader, to apply to his or her own life. Religion has made a healthy living out of contrived platitudes that are completely meaningless in the context of the realities of human existence. The Bible, the Qu’ran, the Torah and all the other religious texts are so written as to be [mis]interepreted by the faithful flock.

    One might as well say that if you breathe air, drink water, consume fats, proteins, carbohydrates, salts, amino acids and other vitamins and minerals, as well as trace amounts of every element & chemical compound, then you’re a doomed sinner. If you urinate, defecate, ejaculate and perspirate, you’re going straight to Hell. The demons that walk amongst us, corrupting our innocence and threatening to plunge society into chaos and destruction, are those who fornicate, copulate and enjoy fellatio or cunnilingus. The fact that all of these things are encoded into the very fabric of our corporeal vessels – the DNA of almost every cell in our body – is a fact that seems to have escaped the notice of those who are so easily conned by priests, vicars, preachers, witch doctors, shaman, tarot card readers, astrologers and other snake-oil salesmen and women.

    I imagine I’d be pretty bummed if I found out I had an incurable terminal illness that was going to cut my life short, versus my expected lifespan. What would I do about it though? Which god should I pray to?

    As a wise friend of mine said, you can be tricked by your genes into believing that love and hormonal bonding are real and tangible. If you think that parents, grandparents, great grandparents – and so on – are somehow going to end up ‘less dead’ than the people who didn’t try to clone themselves, you’re wrong. Even in the most anthropocentric & egocentric of interpretations of theoretical physics, you will have to witness the death of everybody you know, as well as the destruction of the planet, the solar system and the galaxies. Eventually entropy will be victorious over the entire universe, with time itself ceasing to be a meaningful concept and nowhere for you – or indeed anything – to exist.

    If you believe in god(s) capable of making man and a world fit for human habitation, then you must also accept that this power is equally capable of destruction. He taketh away as much as He giveth – you can surely see this with your own eyes. This is the other side of the same coin that says that an infinitely small point, with infinite density and infinite energy, suddenly exploded into a universe. Following the same reasoning, either the universe will eventually collapse back into itself, by the force of its own gravitational pull, or it will expand until it is so uniformly cool and sparse that it is indistinguishable from the most perfect of vacuums – absolute nothingness.

    I look at the world through a madman’s eyes – I’ve read so much and delved so deep into the realm of the theoretical, proven in physical experiments as well as experiments that one can conduct through logical thought alone. I’ve seen, in my mind’s eye, things that cannot be unseen. As Douglas Adams joked, if you see too much of the universe all at once it will destroy you – it’s the ultimate torment; the ultimate death.

    In an uncaring universe, I can see why people would seek comfort in the fairytale worlds of sky monsters and star signs, but it’s pure childishness and immaturity. However, I envy the blissfully ignorant; I envy the blindly faithful, unshakable in their wilful stupidity.

    I’ve worked very hard to master the machines of pure logic and reason – the computers – as well as spending most of my hard-earned wealth on lengthy periods, where I have absented myself from the demands of menial day-to-day existence. I told you that you were wrong about me having squandered my money on drink and drugs. The vast bulk of my conscious waking hours have been spent in startling sobriety; completely crystal clear thinking.

    I carved three deep gashes the length of my forearm, with blood gushing out aplenty, before the arrival of two Metropolitan Police officers interrupted me. I can give you the long and exact chain of decisions that led me to do this, which were robustly defended by a logical thesis. That the police arrived was not a surprising outcome for me; in fact I had already anticipated everything that happened that day. The only thing that surprised me was that I was able to bandage my self-inflicted injuries using an actual first aid kit, which I discovered by chance, rather than having to resort to sanitary towels, kitchen roll and sellotape.

    You would think that I would be completely insane, completely alcoholic, completely drug addicted or perfectly healthy, contented and conspicuously rich. Scratch the surface, and every saint has a past and every sinner has a future.

    If you think the world’s gonna end, why hasn’t it already? If you think everything’s held in stable equilibrium, you simply haven’t looked outside your front door: it’s fucking war out there and nothing is stable at all. Civilisations destroy themselves and species go extinct – there’s evidence of it everywhere.

    Thus, you discover me – a distilled and concentrated form of sinner; completely unrepentant and embodying everything you were told in church to fear and shun; the very epitome of evil. Yet, I’m made of the same stuff as you.

    I invite you to judge me; to critiqué me. I invite this criticism, because how can good exist, without evil?

     

    Tags:

  • Hello, Bachelor Life

    This is a story about convenience…

    Local shop

    I emerge from my apartment building, take a right turn and walk down a street I’ve never walked down before, in a city I’ve never visited before. I reach a T-junction and I look left and right. Which way will lead me to what I want: somewhere to buy a roll of toilet tissue? I turn right again and when I reach the end of another unfamiliar road, I see a shop which is open until late at night. My instincts have guided me swiftly and directly to the nearest supplier of nearly everything that a man could need.

    As I step inside this branch of a well-known chain of miniature supermarkets, the first thing I see is a range of 5 different flavours of noodles. To the plastic containers, one merely needs to add boiling water, producing something that tastes and smells like a small meal in around 5 minutes.

    I had already eaten half a Chinese take-out, when I realised to my horror that in my haste to make way for home and satiate my hunger, I had forgotten to procure anything to drink – to wash down my food – or to deal with any digested remains.

    I dismiss the dishes that can be prepared with very little cookery, and continue to peruse the shelves. I almost forget the reason why I left the house, when the next thing that catches my eye is a fridge full of cold beer. It was only an hour or so ago that I switched my fridge on – it had been switched off and left empty, while my apartment was unoccupied.

    Now with a basket containing 100% alcoholic beverages, I find some concentrated juice drink to balance out my diet. Then, I force myself to get the one thing I left home to come out to buy, before I forget… distracted by dizzying array of choices, colours, prices and imagined tastes, as I browse the different foods on offer.

    Making my way to the cashier to pay, I realise I have nothing but shampoo and shower gel – no soap for my hands and no detergent for the cups, plates and cutlery that I’m going to make dirty. I return to the shelves which I already visited, and drop more things into my shopping basket.

    Emerging onto the darkening streets with plastic bags in hand, I curse as I remember that I will have to go out again to purchase my next meal. Forward planning, I am not.

    I grumble with frustration as the part of my fridge designed to hold milk and orange juice will not immediately accept the alcoholic beverages in their boxed container – the first thing that I put into my fridge; my priorities are clear. I have no milk and I have no orange juice… I can buy those in the morning.

    I realised I can never be a bachelor again, because I’ve been married and divorced. I recalled a time when I owned a house and cooked a 5-course meal with canapés, dining with the girl I had yet to marry, along with another couple. It was a suburban cliché that could have been lifted straight from the 1970s – domestic bliss.

    If the operating lever of my life had been on the “suck” setting up until a certain point, it got flipped to “blow” and the contents of the vacuum cleaner bag were ejaculated back out. In a few short years, everything that had taken decades to grow and build was a dusty unrecognisable mess. Like belly button fluff – which is always blue – the colourful fabric of existence ends up as homogenous greyish crap that you toss into the trash can.

    Anybody brave enough to pick through the remnants of what has been chewed through the machine may find recognisable things, but most people are repelled by something that they associate with dirtiness – I’m somehow unclean; untouchable.

    I make a bet with a boy about the date of Kurt Cobain’s suicide. I win a pint. The boy wasn’t even alive on that day. There’s something timeless in this moment where we compare notes from the past: both of us having lived in a school boarding house. How is this possible? How is it that I’m heading backwards, while this boy is heading forwards? On the day he was born, I went to my very first all-weekend music festival, yet our lives criss-cross and the dates are irrelevant. His face fell as I got an Apple Macbook out of my backpack, and I knew he’d lost another bet, having expected me to be a corporate man in a grey suit. I was that corporate man in a grey suit, but wasn’t I supposed to just get older and then die?

    I write and I mix the tenses; I jumble up the sequence of events. Who knows which way the arrow of time points and if time flows linearly? Does my story make more sense if I tell it backwards? The way that our memories work dictates the convention of telling stories in the past tense, but humanity does not dictate the laws of the universe… most of us subscribe to a worldview that is conveniently bitesize, but not at all correct.

    I’ve flown through the turbulence of existence, experiencing ripples in the fabric of spacetime – like unseen variations in the density of air, which cause an aeroplane to suddenly drop and spill the passengers’ drinks.

    Today has been the most stressful day of my life. I woke up shaking, as if I was shivering with cold.

    Despite the vast amount of things I’ve experienced and can remember, all I can really tell you for certain is that I’ve survived until today, which is a minor miracle. It sounds incredibly egocentric – the universe, after all, does not exist for my benefit – but to all intents and purposes, the sum total of all available sensory inputs that my brain has gathered in thirty-something years, has shown me precisely the opposite, despite my most diligent investigations into the underpinnings of our scientific understanding of the world around us.

    I now need to stop pulling on that loose thread, because the wooly jumper of my mind has unravelled completely and now I’m gathering it back up into a messy spool.

    I collapse into a bed I’ve never slept in, with brand new bedding.

    I’m exhausted, of course.

     

    Tags: